Skip to main content

Learning log #12

Important lessons about healthcare administration can be learned from the 1918 influenza pandemic, especially in the areas of public relations, resource allocation, and crisis management. During a period of restricted medical developments, such as the dearth of vaccines, antibiotics, and efficient therapies, healthcare managers faced enormous problems. This is what stood out most. The foundation for contemporary healthcare systems was laid by their capacity for adaptation, resource management, and public health initiatives. The way the epidemic highlighted the need for public health infrastructure is one particularly intriguing feature. The situation was made worse by the absence of uniformity, particularly in rural areas. This reflects the difficulties encountered during contemporary pandemics, like COVID-19, where inequalities in access to healthcare continue to be a major problem. Healthcare systems advanced as a result of the 1918 epidemic, including investments in hospitals, immunization programs, and cleanliness. This demonstrates how, when handled with foresight by healthcare leaders and politicians, crises can spur long-term improvements. The part healthcare administrators play in fostering trust and communication is another strong argument. Their duty to use newspapers and posters to inform the public while preventing needless fear emphasizes a timeless healthcare principle: openness balanced with certainty. This function has grown to encompass social media and real-time data transmission in the current digital era. The events of 1918 serve as a reminder of how important it is to communicate clearly and effectively while handling public health emergencies. The ethical dilemmas that arose during the pandemic are likewise noteworthy. The choice to give some patients priority over others because of a lack of resources is indicative of persistent ethical issues in healthcare. These conundrums highlight how crucial it is to have precise rules for allocating resources in emergency situations. These teachings are extremely pertinent from the standpoint of healthcare administration. Administrators today should prioritize public trust, enhance resource allocation processes, and bolster crisis readiness by drawing on this past expertise. The pandemic's legacy also emphasizes how crucial it is to make investments in infrastructure, data management, and education in order to successfully avert future disasters. All things considered, the 1918 pandemic emphasizes the ongoing demand for flexible, knowledgeable, and morally motivated leadership in the medical field.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Learning log #9

What I found interesting this week from my own research and my classmates was that the Tuskegee Syphilis Study and healthcare inequities provide vital information for healthcare administration, highlighting the significance of moral accountability, diversity, and fair access to care. Healthcare administrators must endeavor to lessen systemic inequities that impact underprivileged communities by implementing administrative solutions such as data collecting, policy reform, workforce diversity, telemedicine, and community partnerships. This is revealed by the analysis of healthcare disparities. Using electronic health records (EHRs) that collect demographic and socioeconomic information, for example, enables administrators to pinpoint care gaps and create programs specifically for underserved groups. Furthermore, promoting legislative reforms that would improve access for poor areas by lowering out-of-pocket costs and expanding Medicaid coverage can make healthcare more accessible and che...
Post a Comment
Read more

Learning Log #3

 This week we learned about mandatory vaccines. First we started off with Jacobson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts (1905), A Massachusetts legislation requiring smallpox vaccinations for all students was being challenged in this case. Cambridge, Massachusetts resident Henning Jacobson objected to his child receiving a vaccination because of his personal views and history of negative vaccination reactions. After receiving a $5 fine (about $150 in today's currency) for breaking the law, he filed a constitutional rights complaint. The main question was whether Jacobson's right to individual liberty under the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment was violated by the Massachusetts vaccine requirement. Jacobson claimed that because the law restricted his bodily autonomy and personal freedom, it was unconstitutional. In a 7-2 ruling, the US Supreme Court maintained the Massachusetts statute. The Court decided that vaccination laws might be enforced by the state for the protection ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Learning Log #7

Some things I found interesting this week include the convenience with which Thalidomide was introduced into the market without adequate testing, particularly concerning pregnant women, which is among the most alarming information. The fact that it was marketed as an OTC medication despite its hazards emphasizes how inadequate the pharmaceutical laws were at the time. Systemic failures are shown by the inability to recognize its harmful consequences until considerable harm has been done. The enormous amount of Thalidomide that was sold (14.6 tons in Germany in 1960 alone) indicates the drug's extensive effects. The tragedy was substantially exacerbated by its widespread distribution before its detrimental effects were discovered, especially considering how quickly it rose to the top of the sedative sales charts. With many families impacted, this is not simply a localized disaster but also an international tragedy. Thalidomide's paradoxical ability to control TNF-alpha and preve...
Post a Comment
Read more